New York annulment law provides for a abundant added all-embracing analogue of conjugal acreage than is begin in a lot of added states. The analogue activated by New York courts bears little affinity to acceptable concepts of “property” as that appellation is accepted beneath accepted law.

In the ambience of divorce, acreage is authentic as “things of amount arising out of the conjugal relationship.” O’Brien v. O’Brien, 66 N.Y. 2d 576, 583 (1985). “Things of value” may be actual or intangible. Elkus v. Elkus, 169 A.D.2d 134 (1st Dept. 1991). Conjugal property, as that appellation is acclimated in the Domestic Relations Law, includes pensions, avant-garde degrees, and able licenses that, in added contexts, ability not be accustomed as “property”. New York’s Court of Appeals bent that in divorce, a able authorization is an account of amount accountable to candid administration because of its value, as able-bodied as the money, effort, and absent befalling for appliance expended in its acquisition. Added recently, there has been altercation about whether added earning accommodation (even absent a authorization or a degree) may be advised an account of amount accountable to candid distribution. This affair was aboriginal absitively by the New York courts in a annulment case involving a apron who acquired celebrity cachet during a marriage. Golub v. Golub, 139 Misc.2d 440 (Sup. Ct. New York County). The court’s assurance that celebrity cachet was accountable to candid administration was advised by abounding to be a almost aboveboard appliance of the principals audible by the Court of Appeals in O’Brien.

» Read more: Equitable Administration of Conjugal Acreage Beneath New York Annulment Law